18th March 2015 Cat: Perspectives And Modes Of Treatment with Comments Off

Define Classical Conditioning

ivan pavlov classical conditioning demonstrations of dogs finding out how to salivate to previously neutral stimuli served to concentrate attention about the process of classical conditioning. Two early studies dependant on this model get noticed because of the great impact they had within the application of classi­cal conditioning to human problems. Watson and Rayner’s (1920) now famous case of Little Albert was a young illustration of the conditioning of fear. Albert, an eleven-month-old child, initially showed no fear re­actions into a variety of objects, including a white rat. He did, however, exhibit fear any time a loud sound was made by the striking of your steel bar. Watson and Rayner attempt to condition concern with the white rat by producing the loud clanging sound whenever Albert reached with the animal. After some of these pairings, Albert reacted with crying and avoidance in the event the rat was pre­sented devoid of the noise (see Figure 3-3). Thus, it appeared that fear may be learned through classical conditioning. Needless to say, you’ll find significant ethical difficulty with conducting studies including Watson and Rayner’s, and so behavioral re­searchers have tended to target their atten­tion on applying classical conditioning prin­ciples towards the treatment of disorders.

Classical Conditioning

The second landmark study was Mary Cover Jones’s (1924) demonstration that this principles of classical conditioning could possibly be applied towards the removal of fearful responses. Peter, a boy of 24 months and ten months, exhibited a anxiety about furry objects. Tones first attempted to treat Peter by placing him having a rabbit and youngsters who liked the rabbit and petted it. The treatment seemed to be working but was interrupted when Peter be­came ill for almost two months. Just prior to ‘his get back to treatment, he have also been fright­ened by way of a large dog. With Peter’s fear back at its original level, Jones chosen to treat Peter using a counter conditioning proce­dure. This involved allowing Peter to nibble on some of his favorite foods as the animal was moved progressively closer, thus pair­ing the feared stimulus with pleasantness. The procedure was apparently successful in lessening the boy’s fears, and hubby was ulti­mately capable to hold the animal by himself.

This case demonstration lacks sufficient control, and that we cannot draw conclusions about the effectiveness with the proce­dures produced from classical conditioning. Of additional issue is Jones’s inclusion of non earful children in treatment ses­sions. Did the presence with the children, such as the food, make situation pleasant, or did in addition they serve as models for non fear­ful behavior? Despite these limitations, Jones’s contribution was important, and stimulated the introduction of numerous treatments depending on the principles of classi­cal conditioning.


Related Post :